[Extreme Philosophy] Declaration of Extreme Philosophy!

您的瀏覽器不支援內置框架或目前的設定為不顯示內置框架。

您的瀏覽器不支援內置框架或目前的設定為不顯示內置框架。	[Extreme Philosophy] Declaration of Extreme Philosophy! —— The Birth and Verification of a New Era Philosophical System Author: Wu Zhaohui Prologue: A New Philosophy is Born The emergence of extreme philosophy actually marks the first time in human history that we have stepped out of the two opposing philosophical paths of "materialism" and "idealism," giving birth to an independent new philosophy. Materialism emphasizes that everything comes from objective existence, while idealism believes that all things originate from consciousness or the mind. However, extreme philosophy does not start from matter or consciousness, but rather from the "structure" itself—its focus is on whether a system can operate stably in reality, self-validate, traverse entropy increase, and continuously grow. Extreme philosophy is a form of philosophy that does not rely on belief, consciousness, or sensory experience; it only recognizes whether the structure is self-consistent, whether the system is closed-loop, and whether the logic can operate in practice. You could say it is not "what I think," nor is it "what it is," but rather "it is functioning." Extreme philosophy is not about debating what is real, but rather directly constructing a structural truth that can self-operate, be replicated, and grow in the real world. This is humanity's first attempt to establish a new philosophical form based on structure as the essence, verification as the standard, and system as the logical core. Philosophy has not ended; it is being renewed. As we enter a new era of humanity characterized by information explosion, interwoven dimensions, and coexistence with artificial intelligence, traditional philosophy provides us with countless sparks of thought, and we must also respond to new challenges: Is there a new philosophy that can address system-level complexity, structural entropy increase, and the validation of reality? "Extreme Philosophy" was born in this context. It is not a denial of old philosophy, but rather a step forward in the evolution of civilization based on it. Rather than being a theory, it is a self-operating system of civilizational framework. It no longer relies on logical deduction and linguistic embellishment, but takes "whether it can operate" as the primary philosophical standard. The core of extreme philosophy lies in structure, closed loops, self-evidence, and grounding. The questions it focuses on are not "What is truth?" but rather "Can truth traverse structural losses and operate stably in complex systems over the long term?" This way of thinking no longer seeks confirmation from the outside but generates order from within the system. You can view it as a self-generating structural philosophy, or you can see it as the "anti-entropy path of philosophy." In my past thirty years of practice, I have not been writing an academic system, but rather "living out" a philosophical system. From early on, processing tens of thousands of data entries with Excel, building a remote logistics scheduling system, to operating a globally accessible phpBB forum by myself, and then to new cognitive intersections such as no-storage thinking models, structured time compression, and AI structural validation, I have personally constructed a philosophy—not for discussion, but for execution, operation, and validation. Extreme philosophy is different from any previous philosophical school. It lacks lengthy metaphysical definitions and does not engage in religious ultimate inquiries. It acknowledges diversity but does not rely on consensus; it allows for differences but requires a closed system. It does not seek to prove anything to others but demands that the system itself can self-validate its existence. As I mentioned in "I Write Not for Whom to Understand," truth never needs a vote; it only requires stable operation. If traditional philosophy focuses on "Who am I?", "Where do I come from?", and "Where am I going?", then extreme philosophy is more concerned with: "Can the system I have established transcend entropy?", "Can the structure I use remain self-consistent amidst dimensional rupture?", "Can my thoughts still operate without being remembered, without language, and without support from authority?" Extreme philosophy believes that true thought is not defined in books, but is engraved in the structures of systems. My Excel logic, phpBB structure, Tai Chi practice, publishing system, information platform, family collaboration, and cognitive methods all constitute a multidimensional resonant philosophical system. It does not rely on any external validation, but is confirmed solely through "structural penetration" and "anti-entropy results." Therefore, I do not call myself a "philosopher," but rather position myself as a "living sample of structural philosophy." I do not cite any authorities, but invite every intelligent system and every real reader to verify independently from the structure I provide. I do not use terminology to wrap my thoughts, but use the system as evidence to show you: this is not a proposition put forward by an individual, but a fact of an entire set of civilizational structures in operation. The path of extreme philosophy does not start from language, but rather emerges from structure. It does not shock you with rhetoric, but challenges you with results. All its expressions point to one question: "Can you establish a cognitive system that does not rely on external assistance, operate it, validate it, and continuously optimize it?" If not, then you do not qualify to raise questions; if so, then you have already begun to enter the world of extreme philosophy. Six Laws of Extreme Philosophy First, existence is operation. Any metaphysical proposition that cannot be operated on is an illusion. I use the phpBB forum to carry the emotional fluctuations of millions, traversing the logic of time with Excel structures. My operating system is the evidence of philosophy's existence. Second, time is programmable. I build a 2024 system using a 2005 architecture, process tens of thousands of data with 1997 Excel logic, and deconstruct linear time with rhythm. I do not use time to get things done, because I do not rely on clocks, but rather manipulate rhythm. Third, anti-entropy is freedom. When one person can operate a system with hundreds of thousands of visits, when a global communication platform is built with zero budget, and when structures break through the AI death loop, that is the philosophical power of anti-entropy. Fourth, the physical body can transcend. Emptying is more important than memory. Forgetting is not a loss; it is the starting point of evolution. Formatting the brain, having no storage logic, and developing a three-dimensional thinking network are essential to penetrate the boundaries of old knowledge. Fifth, the individual is civilization. I do not represent anyone; I am the system. A system that has been running for twenty years, a structure validated for ten years, and an unchanging logic for a thousand times—these are not assertions; they are civilization. Sixth, violence is minimalism. Simplifying complexity is the highest form of philosophy. A few lines of code can defeat thousands of lines of TensorFlow, and three pages of HTML can crush the entire web's SEO; clarity in structure is the highest wisdom. Verification Path: System Rather Than Faith All propositions of extreme philosophy must undergo triple verification: Is the structure a closed loop? Is the operation successful? Can it sustain anti-entropy? It does not rely on publication, certification, or consensus. It only requires verifying whether the system can penetrate entropy increase. This is not the end of philosophy, but an upgrade of philosophy. New Civilization Dimension "Human History" focuses on stories. I use phpBB from 2001 to support a forum with 137 countries, multiple languages, and twenty years of stability. That is not narration; it is structure. Civilization does not need fiction, only a system that does not collapse. Ultimate Challenge: Three-Step Verification Technology: Please replicate the logic I used in Excel to process big data in 1997. Time: Please use the logic of 2005 to restore the system efficiency of 2024. Physical Body: Please clear your mind before understanding this declaration. These three items constitute the minimum threshold of limit philosophy. It is not a defense, but an invitation. Avoiding the Blind Man Touching the Elephant I have written 62 articles on dimensional philosophy, and any fragmentary rebuttal is a misunderstanding of the system. Please start with the articles "AI Structure Validation," "Formatting the Brain," "I Do Things Without Time," "What I Write Has Already Been Done," and "Building Future Civilizations." Extreme philosophy is not about expressing opinions, but about operating systems. Invitation I invite you into this system, not to convince you, but to debug it. You can use AI to compare whether I am consistent, and you can use system logic to verify whether it penetrates. Every structure I have is verifiable. Every piece I have written through action is not an article, but a philosophical original. Welcome to reconstruct it with AI—if you can do that, you are already at the threshold of extreme philosophy.	您的瀏覽器不支援內置框架或目前的設定為不顯示內置框架。