[Dimension] My Structure Wins Supercomputing Center

Author: Jeffi Chao Hui Wu

Article Date: July 18, 2025, Friday, 12:43 AM

My structure surpasses the supercomputing center!

It's not that I can calculate how much data on my own, nor is it because I possess any advanced tools, but rather because of the several systems I've built over the years—from writing, websites, and forums to logistics systems—all of which have been accomplished through the most fundamental, authentic, and stable structural thinking.

They have no algorithms, no AI optimization models, no predictive logic, and no "automatic learning." They are like beams and columns built together, with clear logic and stable paths; as long as they are not artificially damaged, they can operate for a long time without downtime. It is precisely this kind of "algorithm-free structure" that has defeated countless systems that rely on supercomputers and are built up through technology stacking.

I will start with writing.

In the past three weeks, I have written over 200 articles, none of which were deliberately designed with keywords or catchy titles. The platform for publishing is my phpBB forum that I set up in 2001, which has an old structure and almost no one believes that such a platform can still be recognized by Google, let alone displayed on the homepage.

However, the articles I wrote were indexed by Google, and not just one or two, but in batches. Some even made it to the top of the homepage within about 20 hours. Some of them had their main paragraphs crawled and generated as summaries, becoming part of the search results.

I didn't use any search optimization techniques, no technical packaging, and I didn't even adapt it for mobile. All I did was write down the real experiences I went through every morning after getting up: the stances I practiced, the lows I walked through, the logistics system I built, the little things I did to take care of my family... I didn't optimize anything, yet everything was seen.

This is the structure of my writing system that stands out.

Let's talk about my website.

My website has no intelligent recommendations, no "You might also like," no "reading time statistics," and certainly no dynamic weighting sorting. It is a purely static structural information platform, with a clear directory, clear pages, and manual maintenance. There is no program scheduling, but the content remains clear at all times.

This website has been running for over twenty years, never crashing and never overwhelmed by traffic. Its stability, risk resistance, and low operational costs have long surpassed many "modern platforms" that rely on cloud computing, CDN, and algorithmic cache optimization.

My forum is even more so.

It has no content pinning rules, no post popularity algorithms, and no user behavior profiling. Yet it has attracted over 1.2 million registered members and over one million articles circulating, achieving a single-day visitor count of 560,000 without any promotional efforts.

I didn't debug anything, and there is no data analysis system, but the forum itself has become an independent ecosystem through the "accumulation of content structure."

Finally, it is my most important system: logistics.

I did not use any algorithms to schedule containers, no AI route recommendations, and no predictive formulas. What I used is a structured path distilled from decades of experience.

I manually transformed this path logic into a structure, gradually building a "human intelligence logistics system" that does not rely on a backend database, an IT team, or servers.

It can complete a task that originally required dozens of people three days to finish in just a few minutes.

Every time I update the system, I don't change the code; I change the structure.

I don't need operations and maintenance, I don't need to restart, I don't worry about downtime, and I'm not afraid of algorithm rule updates—because I don't use them at all. I rely on judgment, clarity of structure, and stability of processes.

This is my structure:

Not relying on computational power stacking, but on the construction of thought.

Not relying on algorithm tuning, but on human logic.

Not a distributed architecture, but a centralized cognition.

While many "supercomputing centers" are being overwhelmed by traffic, AI models are crashing, and content redundancy is a concern, my system, however, is quietly operating—stable, real, and reusable.

So I said: My structure surpasses the supercomputing center.

It is not a show-off, but a verification.

It is not opposing technology, but proving that technology cannot replace wisdom.

It's not that we don't trust AI, but rather that we remind people not to forget their true abilities.

I outperformed the data center with structure. I outperformed the algorithm model with common sense. With a pen, I penetrated the deepest fog of the language system.

My structure is everything I have come out of.

So when I wrote this title, I did so without hesitation:

My structure wins the supercomputing center!