[Postscript]

From the inaugural issue to the second issue, I have been moving forward in multidimensional folds. The morning practice, daytime logistics management, and nighttime writing and typesetting—over thirty years of accumulation gradually take shape in these two issues. The inaugural issue is the starting point, while the second issue is a three-dimensional extension. From the initial synchronization of nine languages to the current full matrix of ten languages, each step is an evolution of structure rather than mere expansion.

The content of this issue is tighter and sharper, with each article supported by clear empirical evidence. From the minimalist efficiency of logistics systems to the dynamic circulation of extreme martial arts; from cross-disciplinary philosophical reconstruction to the deep interaction of multidimensional information; from the multidimensional presentation of photography and music to the precise construction of a civilization-level knowledge framework, each section serves as a node in the system chain, resonating with one another and interlocking seamlessly.

I am well aware that such density is not something everyone can grasp at a glance. This is not about catering to others, but rather a choice: to keep "The Leap of Times" operating on a high-dimensional track, undiluted and uncompromised, without adjusting the depth of its structure based on the external pace of understanding. I believe that works truly belonging to the future are always those that can penetrate the barriers of time and language.

This issue's publication is once again completed under minimalist tools and precise structures. times.net.au has successfully launched ten language-specific sections simultaneously, with each language having its own independent publishing entry, thus forming an extension of a multidimensional structure. This is not just a layout of ten languages in parallel, but an open system that allows original empirical work to seamlessly enter the global knowledge network.

In the future, each issue will continue to iterate, continue to refine, and continue to expand. I know that this path will not be easy, but I am even more certain that this is the only correct path. Because structure never deceives, and evidence never betrays.

This is the reason I wrote the postscript for the second issue: to capture the panorama of this moment and to document the next step towards a higher dimension.